Gordon Ramsay has lost a High Court battle over his personal
liability for the rent on a London pub after a judge refused to accept
crucial evidence the celebrity chef gave in court.
The pub deal
took place when his father-in-law Christopher Hutcheson was at the helm
and helping him build his restaurant empire.
The superchef accused
Mr Hutcheson in court of using a ghost writer machine, more commonly
used by authors to sign books and photographs automatically, to forge
his signature on a document which made him the personal guarantor for
the £640,000 annual rent for the York & Albany pub near Regent's
Park.
Today Mr Justice Morgan, sitting in London, dismissed as
"entirely implausible" Ramsay's claim that he did not know the full
extent of the use of the ghost machine.
The judge added:
"Accordingly, I find that Mr Ramsay knew, long before the entry into the
agreement for lease and the lease of the (York & Albany) premises,
that the machine was routinely used to place his signature on legal
documents.
"I do not accept his evidence to the contrary."
PA
The York and Albany pub in Camden, north London
The judge rejected Ramsay's application for a declaration
that the rental guarantee was not binding because his signature "was not
lawfully authorised" when the 25 year lease was signed in 2007.
The
judge said: "I find that when Mr Hutcheson committed Mr Ramsay to the
guarantee in the lease of the premises, Mr Hutcheson was acting within
the wide general authority conferred on him by Mr Ramsay at all times
until Mr Hutcheson's dismissal in October 2010."
The judge added:
"Mr Ramsay may now regret the transaction in relation to the premises.
He may particularly regret his involvement as a guarantor.
"He may
consider that Mr Hutcheson did a bad deal. However, on any finding, he
is not able to say that Mr Hutcheson exceeded his authority in any
respect.
"I hold that Mr Ramsay, acting though his agent Mr Hutcheson, is bound by the guarantee in the lease of the premises."
Film
director Gary Love, who owns the York & Albany, had described
48-year-old Ramsay's legal challenge as an "absurd" attempt to wriggle
out of his rental commitments.
Ramsay - the star of several TV
food programmes including Hell's Kitchen - had told the judge he felt
"like a performing monkey" while building his multimillion-pound
culinary empire, with Mr Hutcheson managing his business.
Rex
Gordon Ramsay during an appearance on The Jonathan Ross Show
His wife, Tana, said in evidence that the discovery that her
father and brother were "systematically defrauding" her husband was
"extremely distressing".
Mrs Ramsay, a close friend of Victoria
Beckham, said she was aware of the use of the ghost writer machine,
which enabled other people to reproduce her husband's signature
electronically, but thought it was for signing merchandising when her
husband was unavailable.
She added: "It did not even occur to me that the machine might be used to sign Gordon's signature on anything else."
Mr
Hutcheson acted as business manager for the Ramsay group of companies
until the chef sacked him and Mrs Ramsay's brother, Adam, on the grounds
of "gross misconduct" in 2010.
Tana married Ramsay in 1996 and has four children with him. In court she spoke about her "dominating, very clever" father.
She
recalled "the shock on Gordon's face" and the horror and disbelief when
the couple's solicitor, Larry Nathan, of law firm Mishcon de Reya, told
her husband that the lease for the York & Albany included a
personal guarantee from him for 25 years
Celebrity chef Gordon Ramsay LOSES High Court battle with father-in-law over London pub deal
Reviewed by Niyi
on
January 20, 2015
Rating: 5
No comments
Kindly drop your comments